You are watching: Express y as a function of x

Reactions:1 person

$x - 8y^3 =0$add $8y^3$ come both political parties of the equation ...$x = 8y^3$divide both political parties by $8$ ...$dfracx8 = y^3$take the cube root of both sides ...$sqrt<3>dfracx8 = sqrt<3>y^3$$dfracsqrt<3>x2 = y$

Reactions:1 person

therefore you know that if (displaystyle x= y^2) you "invert" by making use of the square root: (displaystyle y= sqrtx= x^1/2).

**Well, if (displaystyle x= y^3) friend "invert" by utilizing the cube root**: (displaystyle y= sqrt<3>x= x^1/3).

So you know that if (displaystyle x= y^2) you "invert" by making use of the square root: (displaystyle y= sqrtx= x^1/2).

But (displaystyle x = y^2 ) isn"t a function, and also it can"t it is in rewritten together a duty of x, which is the object of the OP"s thread.

**(displaystyle x = y^2, y ge 0 ) is a function, and it have the right to be rewritten together (displaystyle y= sqrtx= x^1/2).**

But (displaystyle x = y^2 ) isn"t a function, and also it can"t be rewritten together a role of x, which is the topic of the OP"s thread.(displaystyle x = y^2, y ge 0 ) is a function, and it have the right to be rewritten together (displaystyle y= sqrtx= x^1/2).

$x=y^2$ is a function of $y$. Perhaps you mean that the is no a function of $x$. Or probably the term girlfriend are trying to find is the it is not a bijective function. Bijectivity is the actual requirement for a duty to have an inverse.

So you recognize that if (displaystyle x= y^2) you "invert" by utilizing the square root: (displaystyle y= sqrtx= x^1/2).Well, if (displaystyle x= y^3) friend "invert" by making use of the

But (displaystyle x = y^2 ) isn"t a function, and also it can"t be rewritten together a role of x, which is the topic of the OP"s thread.(displaystyle x = y^2, y ge 0 ) is a function, and it have the right to be rewritten together (displaystyle y= sqrtx= x^1/2).

$x=y^2$ is a function of $y$. Perhaps you mean that the is no a function of $x$. Or probably the term girlfriend are trying to find is the it is not a bijective function. Bijectivity is the actual requirement for a duty to have an inverse.

So you recognize that if (displaystyle x= y^2) you "invert" by utilizing the square root

**cube root**: (displaystyle y= sqrt<3>x= x^1/3).

But (displaystyle x = y^2 ) isn"t a function, and also it can"t it is in rewritten as a duty of x, i beg your pardon is the object of the OP"s thread.(displaystyle x = y^2, y ge 0 ) is a function, and also it have the right to be rewritten together (displaystyle y= sqrtx= x^1/2).

$x=y^2$ is a role of $y$. Possibly you average that that is not a function of $x$. Or maybe the term friend are in search of is that it is no a bijective function. Bijectivity is the actual necessity for a function to have an inverse.

See more: Diamond Supply Co X Travis Scott Diamond Shirt, Diamond Supply Co X Travis Scott Explosion T

If us are having a disagreement around functions need to we not have a clear concept what a function is? that is a question foundations class.Definition: intend that every of $A~&~B$ is a nonempty set.The statement that $f$ is a role from $A$ to $B$ method that:$ eginalign*&ullet~fsubseteq A imes B.\&ullet~ extevery xin A ext is the an initial term in precisely one pair in f\ endalign*$Now if $A=B=mathbbR$ it must be clear the $f=(x,x^2)$ is a role and $g=(x^2,x)$ is not!Also $f=(x,x^3)~&~g=(x^3,x)$ room both functions.

Similar mathematics DiscussionsMath ForumDate

how to express these integrals with attributes of Gamma or Beta? | Calculus | Nov 22, 2018 |

How might one write an expression/'function' for these graphs? | Pre-Calculus | Apr 22, 2018 |

How might one create an expression for a role that looks favor this? | Pre-Calculus | Apr 16, 2018 |

expressing attributes as other functions to solve laplace transforms | Differential Equations | Oct 18, 2017 |

Similar threads

How come express these integrals with attributes of Gamma or Beta? |

How can one compose an expression/'function' because that these graphs? |

How could one compose an expression because that a duty that looks prefer this? |

expressing features as other attributes to settle laplace transforms |